State v. . Currie

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Currie

174 S.E. 447, 206 N.C. 598, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 256

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 23, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 174 S.E. 447 (State v. . Currie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Currie, 174 S.E. 447, 206 N.C. 598, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 256 (N.C. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a criminal action tried in the Superior Court of New Hanover County. The defendants were convicted by the jury and appealed to this Court from the judgment of said court. The record proper filed in this Court is fatally defective, for the reason (1) that no indictment appears therein; and (2) that the assignments of error appearing in the case on appeal are not in compliance with the rules of this Court.

There is a statement in the record, signed by the Solicitor for the State and counsel for defendants, to the effect that since the trial of *599 the action, the papers in tbe case have disappeared from.the office of the clerk of the Superior Court, and cannot be found, but that an indictment in due form charging the defendants with conspiracy and robbery was in the record at the time of the trial. This statement is not sufficient. It was the duty of the defendants to see that the indictment appeared in the record, or if lost, to apply to the Superior Court for an order that a copy be supplied. See S. v. McDraughon, 168 N. C., 131, 83 S. E., 181.

The assignments of error are defective for the reason that they do not include the exceptions on which they are founded. It is not sufficient merely to refer to the exceptions as they appear in the case on appeal. Rule 19(3).

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a criminal action tried in the Superior Court of New Hanover County. The defendants were convicted by the jury and appealed to this Court from the judgment of said court. The record proper filed in this Court is fatally defective, for the reason (1) that no indictment appears therein; and (2) that the assignments of error appearing in the case on appeal are not in compliance with the rules of this Court.

There is a statement in the record, signed by the Solicitor for the State and counsel for defendants, to the effect that since the trial of *599 the action, the papers in tbe case have disappeared from.the office of the clerk of the Superior Court, and cannot be found, but that an indictment in due form charging the defendants with conspiracy and robbery was in the record at the time of the trial. This statement is not sufficient. It was the duty of the defendants to see that the indictment appeared in the record, or if lost, to apply to the Superior Court for an order that a copy be supplied. See S. v. McDraughon, 168 N. C., 131, 83 S. E., 181.

The assignments of error are defective for the reason that they do not include the exceptions on which they are founded. It is not sufficient merely to refer to the exceptions as they appear in the case on appeal. Rule 19(3).

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 S.E. 447, 206 N.C. 598, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-currie-nc-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack