State v. Dragani

791 So. 2d 1083, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1379, 2001 WL 776227
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 12, 2001·No. No. SC00-1396·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Dragani v. State, 759 So.2d 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We approve the decision of the district court in affirming the respondent’s convictions. However, we quash that part of the district court’s decision as it relates to the respondént’s sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000).

It is so ordered.

[1084] WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dragani, 791 So. 2d 1083, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1379, 2001 WL 776227 (Fla. 2001).

791 So. 2d 1083 (State v. Dragani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Khadafy Kareem Mullens v. State of Florida
197 So. 3d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)