State v. Dozanti

642 N.E.2d 1089, 71 Ohio St. 3d 177
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1994·No. No. 94-1262·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dozanti, 642 N.E.2d 1089, 71 Ohio St. 3d 177 (Ohio 1994).

642 N.E.2d 1089 (State v. Dozanti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Adams
665 N.E.2d 700 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)
State v. Braxton
656 N.E.2d 970 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)
State v. Dozanti
1994 Ohio 73 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)