State v. Douglas

17 Me. 193
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMay 15, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 Me. 193 (State v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Douglas, 17 Me. 193 (Me. 1840).

Opinion

[195]*195The opinion of the Court was by

Weston C. J.

It has long been an established principle of law, that if goods are stolen in one county, and carried by the guilty party into another, he may be indicted for the larceny in either county. This was recognized by the Court, in the Com. v. Andrews, 2 Mass. R. 17. It was there however insisted, that the rule did not apply where the goods were first stolen in another State, but this distinction was overruled. And in the Com. v. Cullins, 1 Mass. R. 116, Sedgwick J. says, stealing in one county, and bringing the stolen goods into another, was always holden to be felony in both counties. The case of the Com. v. Dewitt, 10 Mass. R. 154, is a direct decision to the same effect.

The exceptions are overruled, and the case remitted to the Court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayo v. State
258 A.2d 269 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1969)
State v. Brown
8 Nev. 208 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Me. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-douglas-me-1840.