Commonwealth v. Dewitt
10 Mass. 154
Opinion
said that he had entertained some doubts at the trial, and wished to have the question saved. Upon further consideration, those doubts, which had been excited by suggestions arising from technical nicety, were dissipated.
The whole Court agreed that the motion must be overruled and the defendant was sentenced,
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Dewitt, 10 Mass. 154 (Mass. 1813).
10 Mass. 154 (Commonwealth v. Dewitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peaper v. State
286 A.2d 176 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1972)
Sanders v. State
21 S.E.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Lasley v. State
1930 OK CR 58 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1930)
State v. Willette
127 P. 1013 (Montana Supreme Court, 1912)
Cox v. Territory
1909 OK CR 104 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1909)
Keith v. Territory of Oklahoma
1899 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1899)
People v. Perrin
56 Cal. 345 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Fletcher v. Pool
20 Ark. 100 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1859)
State v. Underwood
49 Me. 181 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1858)
Commonwealth v. Rand
48 Mass. 475 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1844)
State v. Douglas
17 Me. 193 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1840)