State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMarch 17, 2000
DocketE1999-00274-CCA-R3-CD
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff (State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

FILED March 17, 2000

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee,

V. No. E1999-00274-CCA-R3-CD

DOUGLAS BRYAN BORUFF, Appellant.

CONCURRING OPINION

I fully concur with Judge Riley’s opinion. The only purpose for this

separate opinion is to note my belief that, in this case, aggravated sexual battery

and sexual battery are lesser-included offenses of rape of a child under part (a)

of State v. Burns, 6 S.w.3d 453, 466-67 (Tenn. 1999), see Tenn. Code Ann. § §

39-13-504, -505 (1997), and that under the scheme of the Burns test for

determining lesser-included offenses, the application of part (a) should be

determined before analyzing part (b). I agree that, pursuant to the Burns test for

determining whether the proof justifies an instruction on a lesser-included

offense, the proof in the present case did not warrant an instruction on

aggravated sexual battery. Neither did it warrant an instruction on sexual

battery.

___________________________________ JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-douglas-bryan-boruff-tenncrimapp-2000.