State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff
This text of State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff (State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED March 17, 2000
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee,
V. No. E1999-00274-CCA-R3-CD
DOUGLAS BRYAN BORUFF, Appellant.
CONCURRING OPINION
I fully concur with Judge Riley’s opinion. The only purpose for this
separate opinion is to note my belief that, in this case, aggravated sexual battery
and sexual battery are lesser-included offenses of rape of a child under part (a)
of State v. Burns, 6 S.w.3d 453, 466-67 (Tenn. 1999), see Tenn. Code Ann. § §
39-13-504, -505 (1997), and that under the scheme of the Burns test for
determining lesser-included offenses, the application of part (a) should be
determined before analyzing part (b). I agree that, pursuant to the Burns test for
determining whether the proof justifies an instruction on a lesser-included
offense, the proof in the present case did not warrant an instruction on
aggravated sexual battery. Neither did it warrant an instruction on sexual
battery.
___________________________________ JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Douglas Bryan Boruff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-douglas-bryan-boruff-tenncrimapp-2000.