State v. Doglod
Opinion
FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
AUGUST 18, 2022
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 162
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.
Naike Doglod, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20220035
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Doglod No. 20220035
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Naike Doglod appeals a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of terrorizing and criminal trespass. She argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain her convictions. After reviewing the record, sufficient evidence supports Doglod’s terrorizing and criminal trespass convictions. See State v. Johnson, 2021 ND 161, ¶ 14, 964 N.W.2d 500 (“We have reviewed the evidence in a light favorable to the verdict, considered the reasonable inferences the jury could draw from the evidence, and conclude substantial evidence was presented to the jury to warrant a conviction.”). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2022 ND 162 (State v. Doglod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.