State v. Demery

311 So. 2d 874, 1975 La. LEXIS 5090
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 24, 1975
DocketNo. 55736
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 311 So. 2d 874 (State v. Demery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Demery, 311 So. 2d 874, 1975 La. LEXIS 5090 (La. 1975).

Opinion

CALOGERO, Justice.

Defendant, Mack Lee Demery, was charged with aggravated rape, a capital offense. La.R.S. 14:42. After a trial by jury, on August 21, 1974, he was found guilty of attempted aggravated rape. He was sentenced to serve 20 years at hard labor. On appeal, he relies upon one bill of exceptions for a reversal of his conviction and sentence.

Before the trial court instructed the jury, defendant objected to the proposed charge on the ground that it included the responsive verdicts of attempted aggravated rape and simple rape. Defendant argued that these responsive verdicts are unconstitutional in that they violate the 8th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution, and the Louisiana Constitution. He did not further embellish these arguments at the time the objection was made. He does, however, set forth his argument in brief. It is essentially to the effect that there was no evidence admitted at trial to show an unsuccessful attempt to commit aggravated rape. He argues that the evidence at trial simply proved without question the successful perpetration of the crime of aggravated rape. He suggests that the only issue was whether defendant [875]*875was one of the persons who committed rape upon the victim.

There is no merit in this argument, First of all, statutorily, attempted aggravated rape is a lesser included and responsive verdict to aggravated rape. Article 814, C.Cr.P. Furthermore, simple logic suggests, as the whole encompasses all of its parts, that aggravated rape includes an attempt at same.1

There are no other prefected bills or assignments of error or error discoverable from a review of the pleadings and proceedings.

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jamison
640 So. 2d 438 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 So. 2d 874, 1975 La. LEXIS 5090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-demery-la-1975.