State v. Delama
967 So. 2d 385, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16302, 2007 WL 3008593
Opinions
While the ruling below was entirely understandable, the trial court lacked authority to deny the state’s request to issue a rule to show cause against the respondent Jimenez under the circumstances. Accordingly, the order on review is quashed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
ROTHENBERG, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Delama, 967 So. 2d 385, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16302, 2007 WL 3008593 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
967 So. 2d 385 (State v. Delama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harper v. State
217 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Moakley v. Smallwood
826 So. 2d 221 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Thomas v. State
752 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Kelley v. Rice
800 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
In Re Getty
427 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Valdez v. State
555 So. 2d 1311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)