State v. Deitchler

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 5, 1991
Docket91-165
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Deitchler (State v. Deitchler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Deitchler, (Mo. 1991).

Opinion

No. 91-165

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1991

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Respondent, -vs- WESTLEY F. DEITCHLER, Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District, In and for the County of Rosebud, The Honorable Joe L. Hegel, Judge presiding.

COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Westley F. D itch1 r, Pr Se, De r Lodg Montana For Respondent: Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General; George Schunk, Assistant Atty. General, Helena, Montana John S. Forsythe, County Attorney, Forsyth, Montana

Submitted on Briefs: October 10, 1991 Decided: November 5, 1991 Filed: Justice Karla M. Gray delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Westley Floyd Deitchler appeals the judgment of the District Court for the Sixteenth Judicial District, Rosebud County, which found him guilty of twelve misdemeanor offenses including driving without a valid driver's license, operating a vehicle with expired registration, and failure to carry proof of liability insurance. We affirm. The appellant challenges the constitutionality of state statutes requiring citizens to have a valid driver's license, § 61-

5-102, MCA; current car registration, 5 61-3-301, MCA; and proof of

liability insurance, 5 61-6-301, MCA. The State responds that this Court has addressed and settled these issues. We agree. The appellant himself previously challenged the State's authority to require drivers' licenses. We rejected the constitutional arguments on that issue in State v. Deitchler (1982), 201 Mont. 70, 651 P.2d 1020. Subsequently, we quoted Deitchler with approval in a decision upholding the constitutionality of State statutes requiring drivers to carry drivers' licenses, motor vehicle registration and proofs of vehicle insurance. City of Billings v. Skurdal (1986), 224 Mont. 84, 730 P.2d 371. When the appellant Skurdal brought a second appeal to this Court, we again upheld the constitutionality of drivers' license requirements. State v. Skurdal (1988), 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304. These issues are now well settled in Montana. We will not address them again in this case. In addition, we do not address 2 the appellant's arguments regarding the federal monetary system. Those arguments have no relevance to the misdemeanor convictions from which Deitchler appeals. Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as

precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and by a report of its result to Montana Law Week, State Reporter and West Publishing Company. Af finned.

We concur:

3 November 5, 1991

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the following order was sent by United States mail, prepaid, to the following named:

Westley F. Deitchler 700 Conley Lake Rd. Deer Lodge, MT 59722

Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General

Helena, MT 59620

John S. Forsythe County Attorney P.O. Box 69 Forsyth, MT 59321

E D SMITH

sT CLERK O F THE SUPREME COURT

BY. Deputy

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Billings v. Skurdal
730 P.2d 371 (Montana Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Skurdal
767 P.2d 304 (Montana Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Deitchler
651 P.2d 1020 (Montana Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Deitchler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-deitchler-mont-1991.