State v. DEBERRY

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. DEBERRY

351 S.W.3d 248, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1423, 2011 WL 5064405

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2011·No. ED 95620·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Deberry, appeals from a judgment entered in a court-tried case finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated, in violation of section 577.010 RSMo (2000). The trial court found that defendant was a prior and persistent offender under section 558.016 and a persistent offender for intoxication-related traffic offenses under section 577.028, and sentenced him to five years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Deberry, appeals from a judgment entered in a court-tried case finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated, in violation of section 577.010 RSMo (2000). The trial court found that defendant was a prior and persistent offender under section 558.016 and a persistent offender for intoxication-related traffic offenses under section 577.028, and sentenced him to five years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. DEBERRY, 351 S.W.3d 248, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1423, 2011 WL 5064405 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

351 S.W.3d 248 (State v. DEBERRY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related