State v. Bobbitt

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bobbitt

351 S.W.3d 248, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1422, 2011 WL 5064372

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2011

DocketED 95514

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 351 S.W.3d 248 (State v. Bobbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bobbitt, 351 S.W.3d 248, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1422, 2011 WL 5064372 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Bobbitt (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of two counts of murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced Defendant to life without the possibility of parole for first degree murder and three years’ imprisonment for armed criminal action, to be served concurrently. Defendant raises two allegations of error, claiming the trial court erred in admitting prior trial testimony of an unavailable witness and admitting testimony of the investigating officer regarding his investigation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Bobbitt (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of two counts of murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced Defendant to life without the possibility of parole for first degree murder and three years’ imprisonment for armed criminal action, to be served concurrently. Defendant raises two allegations of error, claiming the trial court erred in admitting prior trial testimony of an unavailable witness and admitting testimony of the investigating officer regarding his investigation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 S.W.3d 248, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1422, 2011 WL 5064372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bobbitt-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack