State v. Davis

116 P.3d 254, 200 Or. App. 604, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 861
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 Or. App. 456
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 13, 2005·No. 02C52140; A122736·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. She argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence that police officers found after arresting her for violating the terms of her probation. The state concedes that the officers did not have objective probable cause to believe that defendant had violated the terms of her probation. We agree and therefore reverse the conviction.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 116 P.3d 254, 200 Or. App. 604, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 861 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

116 P.3d 254 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 475.992
Oregon § 475.992