State v. Davis

106 Mo. 230
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 Mo. 230 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Davis, 106 Mo. 230 (Mo. 1891).

Opinion

Thomas, J.

Defendants were indicted in t.he circuit court of Harrison county for disturbing the peace of a family by loud, offensive and indecent conversation, and by threatening, challenging and fighting. Being tried and convicted,- they appealed to the Kansas City court of appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court, and on their motion the case was transferred to this court, on the ground that the decision was in conflict with the opinion,of the St. Louis court of appeals in the case of State v. Bach, 25 Mo. App. 554. But as the opinion in State v. Bach has been overruled by the St. Louis court of appeals in State v. McDaniel, 40 Mo. App. 356; State v. Fare, 39 Mo. App. 110; State v. Parker, 39 Mo. App. 116, and State v. Buck, 43 Mo. App. 443, there is now no conflict between the two courts of appeals on the question involved, and hence there is nothing for us to decide, the correct doctrine having been announced in State v. Buck, State v. McDaniel, State v. Fare and State v. Parker, supra. Judgment affirmed.

All of this division concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Taylor
67 S.W. 672 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 Mo. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-mo-1891.