State v. Davis

997 So. 2d 1278, 2009 WL 30160
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 2009
Docket3D07-1396
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 997 So. 2d 1278 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Davis, 997 So. 2d 1278, 2009 WL 30160 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

997 So.2d 1278 (2009)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Tyrone DAVIS, Appellee.

No. 3D07-1396.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 7, 2009.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Timothy R.M. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and SUAREZ and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

On Motion for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellant's motion for rehearing, withdraw our former opinion dated November 19, 2008, and substitute the following opinion in its stead.

The State appeals the sentence imposed in the instant case entered pursuant to a plea offered by the trial court to the defendant over the State's objection. Because the record reflects that: (1) the sentence imposed was a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines; (2) the trial court failed to provide any grounds for imposing a downward departure; and (3) the State timely objected to the imposition of a departure from the sentencing guidelines, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment and sentence and permit the defendant to withdraw his plea. See State v. Berry, 976 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that the absence of valid reasons for departure, requires reversal and remand for resentencing or withdrawal of the defendant's plea). This ruling does not preclude the imposition of a sentence that departs from the sentencing guidelines, *1279 and is supported by valid grounds for the departure.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glover v. State
75 So. 3d 238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Jackson v. State
64 So. 3d 90 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
State v. Jackson
22 So. 3d 817 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Williams
20 So. 3d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
997 So. 2d 1278, 2009 WL 30160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-fladistctapp-2009.