Glover v. State

75 So. 3d 238, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2568, 2011 WL 5083249
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 2011
DocketNo. SC10-254
StatusPublished

This text of 75 So. 3d 238 (Glover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glover v. State, 75 So. 3d 238, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2568, 2011 WL 5083249 (Fla. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Glover, 25 So.3d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), in which the First District Court of Appeal reversed a downward departure sentence and remanded for sentencing within the statutory guidelines. Petitioner alleges express and direct conflict with State v. Williams, 20 So.3d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), State v. Davis, 997 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), and State v. Berry, 976 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition of Jackson v. State, 64 So.3d 90 (Fla.2011), in which we ultimately quashed the First District’s underlying Jackson decision and approved the opinions rendered by the Third District in Williams, Davis, and Berry to the extent that they are consistent with our holding. Jackson, 64 So.3d at 93. We then issued an order directing respondent in the present case to show cause why we should not accept jurisdiction, quash the First District’s Glover decision, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Jackson. Respondent in its response agrees that there is no reason why this Court should not remand for reconsideration of Jackson.

We have accordingly determined to accept jurisdiction and grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the First District for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in Jackson.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
20 So. 3d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Glover
25 So. 3d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Berry
976 So. 2d 645 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
State v. Davis
997 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Jackson v. State
64 So. 3d 90 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 So. 3d 238, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2568, 2011 WL 5083249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-state-fla-2011.