State v. Davis
485 So. 2d 24, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6869
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 433 →
Opinion
From our review of the record, which includes the tape recording of the polygraph examinations and the transcript of appellee’s confessions which immediately followed, we cannot say that the court erred in suppressing the confessions as the product of an unacceptable level of psychological coercion exerted by the polygraph examiner on the appellee. See Brewer v. State, 386 So.2d 232 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Davis, 485 So. 2d 24, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6869 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
485 So. 2d 24 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brewer v. State
386 So. 2d 232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)