State v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Davis

458 So. 2d 868, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2393, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16536

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 1984

DocketNo.. 83-2485

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 868 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Davis, 458 So. 2d 868, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2393, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order discharging Ransel Davis from criminal prosecution because of a speedy trial violation upon authority of Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.191 and Giglio v. Kaplan, 392 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), State v. Breedlove, 400 So.2d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA), pet. for rev. den., 402 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1981).

We further point out that placing a de-tainer on a defendant who is in custody in another jurisdiction based on unrelated charges does not trigger the running of the speedy trial rule. Perkins v. State, 457 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), State v. Lazarus, 433 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), and Gaskins v. State, 415 So.2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Reversed.

DOWNEY, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI