State v. Davis

458 So. 2d 868, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2393, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16536
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 14, 1984·No. No.. 83-2485·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order discharging Ransel Davis from criminal prosecution because of a speedy trial violation upon authority of Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.191 and Giglio v. Kaplan, 392 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), State v. Breedlove, 400 So.2d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA), pet. for rev. den., 402 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1981).

We further point out that placing a de-tainer on a defendant who is in custody in another jurisdiction based on unrelated charges does not trigger the running of the speedy trial rule. Perkins v. State, 457 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), State v. Lazarus, 433 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), and Gaskins v. State, 415 So.2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Reversed.

DOWNEY, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 458 So. 2d 868, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2393, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 868 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. State
132 So. 3d 925 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)