Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Darden

State v. Darden

670 A.2d 1306, 236 Conn. 905, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 67
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 5, 1996
DocketSC 15360
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 670 A.2d 1306 (State v. Darden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Darden, 670 A.2d 1306, 236 Conn. 905, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 67 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. [906]*906645 (AC 14010), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15360. Decided February 5, 1996 Lawrence J. Tytla, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Jeremiah Donovan, in opposition.

“Having found that the state had inadvertently destroyed evidence relevant to the defendant’s guilt, did the Appellate Court properly order a new trial rather than an evidentiary hearing?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Darden
687 A.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 A.2d 1306, 236 Conn. 905, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-darden-conn-1996.