State v. Dansky

South Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Dansky

9 N.W.2d 752, 69 S.D. 311, 1943 S.D. LEXIS 35

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedMay 27, 1943

DocketFile No. 8643.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 N.W.2d 752 (State v. Dansky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dansky, 9 N.W.2d 752, 69 S.D. 311, 1943 S.D. LEXIS 35 (S.D. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant was charged by information with the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses. The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty and defendant has appealed from the judgment. The Attorney General has filed in this court a confession of error in which it is stated that upon due consideration of the record he is of the opinion that the evidence is insufficient to justify the conviction and the parties have agreed by stipulation filed in the court that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded to the lower court for new trial. *Page 312

We have examined the record and are of the opinion that the evidence is manifestly insufficient to support the judgment. Because of the disposition of this appeal, we have not examined into the other numerous assignments of error.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial.

All the Judges concur, except WARREN, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant was charged by information with the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses. The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty and defendant has appealed from the judgment. The Attorney General has filed in this court a confession of error in which it is stated that upon due consideration of the record he is of the opinion that the evidence is insufficient to justify the conviction and the parties have agreed by stipulation filed in the court that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded to the lower court for new trial. *Page 312

We have examined the record and are of the opinion that the evidence is manifestly insufficient to support the judgment. Because of the disposition of this appeal, we have not examined into the other numerous assignments of error.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial.

All the Judges concur, except WARREN, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.W.2d 752, 69 S.D. 311, 1943 S.D. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dansky-sd-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack