City of Sioux Falls v. Jager
13 N.W.2d 52, 69 S.D. 578, 1944 S.D. LEXIS 60
Opinion
An information was filed charging the defendant with the sale of liquor on a certain day in March, 1943. The respondent has filed in this court a written confession of error in which there are certain recitals of questions asked relating to prior prosecutions.
An examination of the record indicates that there is prejudicial error and that the judgment cannot be sustained. State v. Dansky, 69 S. D. 311, 9 N. W.2d 752.
The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Sioux Falls v. Jager, 13 N.W.2d 52, 69 S.D. 578, 1944 S.D. LEXIS 60 (S.D. 1944).
13 N.W.2d 52 (City of Sioux Falls v. Jager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Pierce
220 N.W.2d 254 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1974)