City of Sioux Falls v. Jager

13 N.W.2d 52, 69 S.D. 578, 1944 S.D. LEXIS 60
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided February 11, 1944·No. File No. 8656.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An information was filed charging the defendant with the sale of liquor on a certain day in March, 1943. The respondent has filed in this court a written confession of error in which there are certain recitals of questions asked relating to prior prosecutions.

An examination of the record indicates that there is prejudicial error and that the judgment cannot be sustained. State v. Dansky, 69 S. D. 311, 9 N. W.2d 752.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

All the Judges concur, except SMITH, J., absent and not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Sioux Falls v. Jager, 13 N.W.2d 52, 69 S.D. 578, 1944 S.D. LEXIS 60 (S.D. 1944).

13 N.W.2d 52 (City of Sioux Falls v. Jager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Pierce
220 N.W.2d 254 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1974)