City of Sioux Falls v. Jager

13 N.W.2d 52, 69 S.D. 578, 1944 S.D. LEXIS 60
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1944
DocketFile No. 8656.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 N.W.2d 52 (City of Sioux Falls v. Jager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Sioux Falls v. Jager, 13 N.W.2d 52, 69 S.D. 578, 1944 S.D. LEXIS 60 (S.D. 1944).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An information was filed charging the defendant with the sale of liquor on a certain day in March, 1943. The respondent has filed in this court a written confession of error in which there are certain recitals of questions asked relating to prior prosecutions.

An examination of the record indicates that there is prejudicial error and that the judgment cannot be sustained. State v. Dansky, 69 S. D. 311, 9 N. W.2d 752.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

All the Judges concur, except SMITH, J., absent and not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pierce
220 N.W.2d 254 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.W.2d 52, 69 S.D. 578, 1944 S.D. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-sioux-falls-v-jager-sd-1944.