State v. D. A. H.
206 P.3d 1113, 227 Or. App. 640, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 298
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. D. A. H., 206 P.3d 1113, 227 Or. App. 640, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 298 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
206 P.3d 1113 (State v. D. A. H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Dah
206 P.3d 1113 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)