In the Matter of Dah

206 P.3d 1113, 227 Or. App. 640
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 22, 2009·No. 080767421, A139676·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

206 P.3d 1113 (2009)
227 Or. App. 640

In the Matter of D.A.H., aka D.P., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
D.A.H., aka D.P., Appellant.

080767421, A139676.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted March 6, 2009.
Decided April 22, 2009.

Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and M. Ann Boss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Dah, 206 P.3d 1113, 227 Or. App. 640 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

206 P.3d 1113 (In the Matter of Dah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinsen v. Employment Department
206 P.3d 1113 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)