In the Matter of Dah

206 P.3d 1113, 227 Or. App. 640
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 22, 2009
Docket080767421, A139676
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 P.3d 1113 (In the Matter of Dah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Dah, 206 P.3d 1113, 227 Or. App. 640 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

206 P.3d 1113 (2009)
227 Or. App. 640

In the Matter of D.A.H., aka D.P., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
D.A.H., aka D.P., Appellant.

080767421, A139676.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted March 6, 2009.
Decided April 22, 2009.

Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and M. Ann Boss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martinsen v. Employment Department
206 P.3d 1113 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.3d 1113, 227 Or. App. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-dah-orctapp-2009.