State v. Cyrus

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Cyrus

966 A.2d 238, 290 Conn. 919, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 564

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 5, 2009·No. SC 18326·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 482 (AC 28889), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the state police did not have a reasonable and articulable *920 suspicion to stop the defendant for driving with obstructed vision under General Statutes § 14-99f (c)?”

Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18326. Harry Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 482 (AC 28889), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the state police did not have a reasonable and articulable *920 suspicion to stop the defendant for driving with obstructed vision under General Statutes § 14-99f (c)?”

Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18326. Harry Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

State v. Cyrus, 966 A.2d 238, 290 Conn. 919, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 564 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

966 A.2d 238 (State v. Cyrus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related