State v. C.W.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. C.W.

201 P.3d 225, 225 Or. App. 301, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 22

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 14, 2009

Docket081102; A138421

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 P.3d 225 (State v. C.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. C.W., 201 P.3d 225, 225 Or. App. 301, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 22 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her own basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her own basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 P.3d 225, 225 Or. App. 301, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cw-orctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack