State v. Cusumano

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cusumano

358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565, 2011 WL 5864540

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 22, 2011

DocketED 95885

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 358 S.W.3d 137 (State v. Cusumano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cusumano, 358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565, 2011 WL 5864540 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rick Cusumano (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, RSMo 1986, 1 and one count of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment on both counts to be served concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rulé 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 1986.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI