State v. Cusumano

358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565, 2011 WL 5864540
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 2011·No. ED 95885·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rick Cusumano (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, RSMo 1986, 1 and one count of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment on both counts to be served concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rulé 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 1986.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cusumano, 358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565, 2011 WL 5864540 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

358 S.W.3d 137 (State v. Cusumano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cusumano v. Griffith
E.D. Missouri, 2019
Rick J. Cusumano v. State of Missouri
494 S.W.3d 652 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Cusumano
399 S.W.3d 909 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)
Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb
358 S.W.3d 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)