Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb

358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1567, 2011 WL 5864641
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
DocketED 96643
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 358 S.W.3d 137 (Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb, 358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1567, 2011 WL 5864641 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vesna Petrovic (“Claimant”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission’s”) Final Award Allowing Compensation (“Final Award”), denying Claimant permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund (“SIF”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cusumano
358 S.W.3d 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1567, 2011 WL 5864641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrovic-v-bausch-lomb-moctapp-2011.