Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb

Missouri Court of Appeals

Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb

358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1567, 2011 WL 5864641

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 2011·No. ED 96643·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vesna Petrovic (“Claimant”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission’s”) Final Award Allowing Compensation (“Final Award”), denying Claimant permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund (“SIF”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vesna Petrovic (“Claimant”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission’s”) Final Award Allowing Compensation (“Final Award”), denying Claimant permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund (“SIF”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb, 358 S.W.3d 137, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1567, 2011 WL 5864641 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

358 S.W.3d 137 (Petrovic v. Bausch & Lomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related