State v. Cushing

29 Mo. 215
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 29 Mo. 215 (State v. Cushing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cushing, 29 Mo. 215 (Mo. 1859).

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

An examination of the testimony in this case has satisfied us that if the jury committed any error in their verdict, it was an error in favor of the accused.

The instructions upon which the case was tried are substantially correct. The one chiefly complained of, concerning murder in the second degree, appears to, conform-to the views expressed by this court in the case of the State v. Phillips & Ross, 24 Mo. 488.)

The instructions asked by .the defendant were, in our opinion, properly refused. The first is an instruction directing the jury to disregard the entire evidence of a witness, if they believe him false in any particular. Such instructions invade the province of the jury, whose business it is to determine the credibility of witnesses, and who are not to be hampered in exercising their judgment by any inflexible rules on the subject. The second instruction is a comment on the testimony, which, under our practice, is not permitted, and so is the third. The fourth is not law.

The proof of the venue in this case was a matter for the jury. (State v. Lamb, 28 Mo. 228.) The judgment is affirmed;

the other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Whipkey
215 S.W.2d 492 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1948)
Payne v. Reese
110 S.E. 740 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Argabright v. State
69 N.W. 102 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
McCormick v. City of Monroe
64 Mo. App. 197 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Bunce v. Mc Mahon
42 P. 23 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1895)
State v. Meagher
49 Mo. App. 571 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
State v. Patrick
107 Mo. 147 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
State v. Young
99 Mo. 666 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1889)
Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R.
66 Mo. 588 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)
State v. Smith
53 Mo. 267 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1873)
Paulette v. Brown
40 Mo. 52 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Mo. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cushing-mo-1859.