State v. Curtis
863 S.W.2d 6, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1506, 1993 WL 375989
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Curtis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 159 →
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals his convictions for second degree burglary and stealing. We find the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to support Defendant’s convictions. We further find the trial court’s denial of Defendant’s suppression motion was not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A written opinion has been furnished the parties, for their information only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Curtis, 863 S.W.2d 6, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1506, 1993 WL 375989 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
863 S.W.2d 6 (State v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.