State v. Curtis

854 S.W.2d 859, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 876, 1993 WL 199151
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Curtis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 159
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 1993·No. No. 61183·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was tried on an information in lieu of indictment for robbery in the first degree, in violation of § 569.020 RSMo. (1986). Defendant was found guilty of a Class A felony and sentenced to thirty years imprisonment as a prior offender. Defendant alleges the trial court erred in refusing to excuse a venireperson for cause and challenges the use of the definition of reasonable doubt from MAI-CR3rd 302.04 and the procedure of empaneling the grand and petit juries in St. Louis. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Curtis, 854 S.W.2d 859, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 876, 1993 WL 199151 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

854 S.W.2d 859 (State v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.