State v. Crum
154 P.3d 174, 211 Or. App. 392, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 380
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 14, 2007
Docket040496, 044414; A126858, A126859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 154 P.3d 174 (State v. Crum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Crum, 154 P.3d 174, 211 Or. App. 392, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 380 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
In case A126858, affirmed. In case A126859, sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. State v. Bray, 197 Or App 12, 104 P3d 631 (2005), rev allowed, 340 Or 672 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Crum
154 P.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
154 P.3d 174, 211 Or. App. 392, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crum-orctapp-2007.