State v. Crawford

193 P.3d 1027, 222 Or. App. 401, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1290
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 24, 2008·No. 041236920; A132307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted after jury trial on one count of attempted murder, ORS 163.115; ORS 161.405, four counts of first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415, two counts of second-degree robbery, ORS 164.405, and one count of first-degree assault, ORS 163.185. On appeal, he challenges his convictions and his sentences. We reject without discussion defendant’s challenge to his convictions. The trial court imposed a partially consecutive sentence on one of defendant’s convictions over his objection, making findings pursuant to ORS 137.123(5). On appeal, defendant argues that the court erred in imposing that consecutive sentence based on judicial factfinding. The state acknowledges that defendant is correct under the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Ice, 343 Or 248, 260, 170 P3d 1049 (2007), cert granted,_US_, 128 S Ct 1657 (2008). We agree.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Crawford, 193 P.3d 1027, 222 Or. App. 401, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1290 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

193 P.3d 1027 (State v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Crawford
193 P.3d 1027 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)