State v. Cox

738 A.2d 652, 251 Conn. 54, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 358
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 19, 1999·No. SC 16027·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a jury trial, the defendant, Freddie Cox, Jr., was convicted of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2).1 The defendant appealed his conviction, claiming that “(1) the state committed prosecutorial misconduct during the questioning of witnesses and during its closing argument, (2) the trial court made an improper statement to the jury thereby depriving the defendant of a fair trial and (3) the trial court improperly charged the jury, sua sponte, on consciousness of guilt, which allowed the jury to infer flight on an inadequate factual basis.” State v. Cox, 50 Conn. App. 175, 176-77, 718 A.2d 60 (1998). The Appellate Court rejected the defendant’s arguments and affirmed his conviction. Id. We granted certification, limited to the following issues: (1) “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was [56] a sufficient evidentiary basis for the trial court’s instruction on flight or consciousness of guilt?” and (2) “If the answer to the first question is no, was the error harmful?” State v. Cox, 247 Conn. 928, 719 A.2d 1170 (1998).

Having examined the record on appeal, studied the briefs and heard the arguments of the parties, we conclude that the judgment of the Appellate Court should be affirmed. The issue on which we granted certification was properly resolved in the thoughtful and comprehensive opinion of the Appellate Court. See, e.g., Brennan v. Burger King Corp., 244 Conn. 204, 206, 707 A.2d 30 (1998); Murphy v. Buonato, 241 Conn. 319, 321-22, 696 A.2d 320 (1997).

The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cox, 738 A.2d 652, 251 Conn. 54, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 358 (Colo. 1999).

738 A.2d 652 (State v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Eason
976 A.2d 797 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
State v. Wright
800 A.2d 1218 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
State v. Abraham
780 A.2d 223 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)
State v. Jordan
781 A.2d 310 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)
State v. Holmes
778 A.2d 253 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)
State v. Outlaw
772 A.2d 1122 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
Dill v. State
741 N.E.2d 1230 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Beall
769 A.2d 708 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)
State v. Saez
758 A.2d 894 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
State v. Hicks
743 A.2d 640 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)