Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Cox

State v. Cox

719 A.2d 1170, 247 Conn. 928, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 416
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 22, 1998
DocketSC 16027
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 A.2d 1170 (State v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cox, 719 A.2d 1170, 247 Conn. 928, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 416 (Colo. 1998).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 175 (AC 16933), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was a sufficient evidentiary basis for the trial court’s instruction on flight or consciousness of guilt?

“2. If the answer to the first question is no, was the error harmful?”

[929]*929The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16027. Tara L. Knight, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cox
738 A.2d 652 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 A.2d 1170, 247 Conn. 928, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cox-conn-1998.