State v. Cox

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Cox

719 A.2d 1170, 247 Conn. 928, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 416

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 22, 1998·No. SC 16027·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 175 (AC 16933), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was a sufficient evidentiary basis for the trial court’s instruction on flight or consciousness of guilt?

“2. If the answer to the first question is no, was the error harmful?”

[929] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16027. Tara L. Knight, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 175 (AC 16933), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was a sufficient evidentiary basis for the trial court’s instruction on flight or consciousness of guilt?

“2. If the answer to the first question is no, was the error harmful?”

[929] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16027. Tara L. Knight, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

State v. Cox, 719 A.2d 1170, 247 Conn. 928, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 416 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

719 A.2d 1170 (State v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related