State v. Cornelius
317 S.W.3d 690, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1096, 2010 WL 3303690
Opinion
Order
Curtis L. Cornelius appeals his conviction of forcible rape. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his request for mistrial when the DNA analyst testified that his DNA standard was submitted under a different case number. He argues that this was inadmissible evidence of un *691 charged misconduct. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cornelius, 317 S.W.3d 690, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1096, 2010 WL 3303690 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
317 S.W.3d 690 (State v. Cornelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barber v. Hall
317 S.W.3d 690 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)