Barber v. Hall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barber v. Hall

317 S.W.3d 690, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1097, 2010 WL 3303698

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 24, 2010·No. WD 70866·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Larry Barber appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Clay County in favor of Dr. Robert Hall, Dr. Jonathan Blake, and Orthopedic Surgeons, Inc. in an action for medical malpractice filed by Barber. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Larry Barber appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Clay County in favor of Dr. Robert Hall, Dr. Jonathan Blake, and Orthopedic Surgeons, Inc. in an action for medical malpractice filed by Barber. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Barber v. Hall, 317 S.W.3d 690, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1097, 2010 WL 3303698 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

317 S.W.3d 690 (Barber v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related