State v. Cook

51 P.3d 673, 183 Or. App. 237, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1210
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 7, 2002·No. 961037561; A106503·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for three counts of aggravated murder, involving two separate victims. He assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of three consecutive “true life” sentences, arguing that there may be no more convictions for aggravated murder than there are victims. The state concedes error, and we agree. State v. Barrett, 331 Or 27, 10 P3d 901 (2000). Defendant’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Remanded for resentencing on two convictions for aggravated murder; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cook, 51 P.3d 673, 183 Or. App. 237, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1210 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

51 P.3d 673 (State v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cook
135 P.3d 260 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2006)
State v. Cook
51 P.3d 673 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)