State v. Cook
This text of 958 P.2d 841 (State v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review,
v.
Rafael Roman COOK, Respondent on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General.
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.
Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, DURHAM and LEESON, JJ.[**]
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. See State v. Boone, 327 Or. 307, 959 P.2d 76 (1998).
NOTES
[**] Fadeley, J., retired January 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Graber, J., resigned March 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
958 P.2d 841, 327 Or. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cook-or-1998.