State v. Constance

605 So. 2d 1074, 1992 La. LEXIS 2554, 1992 WL 218193
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 2, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-2430·Published

Opinion

In re Constance, Robert; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 261-779.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about June 21, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Constance, 605 So. 2d 1074, 1992 La. LEXIS 2554, 1992 WL 218193 (La. 1992).

605 So. 2d 1074 (State v. Constance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.