State v. Constance

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Constance

595 So. 2d 641, 1992 La. LEXIS 1255, 1992 WL 68674

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 30, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-0764·Published

Opinion

In re Constance, Robert; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of West Baton Rouge, Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 40,979.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed in October of 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Constance, Robert; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of West Baton Rouge, Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 40,979.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed in October of 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State v. Constance, 595 So. 2d 641, 1992 La. LEXIS 1255, 1992 WL 68674 (La. 1992).

Pincite

595 So. 2d 641 (State v. Constance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.