State v. Connard
354 S.E.2d 238, 319 N.C. 392, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 1939
Opinion
At trial defendant in case number 85CRS8429 was convicted and sentenced for the felonious possession of stolen property, a violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-71.1. The Court of Appeals, after concluding that certain evidence offered against defendant in this case was the product of an unconstitutional search and seizure and that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress this evidence, ordered a new trial.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Connard, 354 S.E.2d 238, 319 N.C. 392, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 1939 (N.C. 1987).
354 S.E.2d 238 (State v. Connard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2026
State v. Scanlon
626 S.E.2d 770 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Mathis
625 S.E.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Massey
621 S.E.2d 633 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Lawrence
612 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Newsom
600 S.E.2d 522 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Wiggins
589 S.E.2d 402 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
State v. Tucker
575 S.E.2d 770 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
State v. Floyd
558 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Lodermeier
481 N.W.2d 614 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Schmitz
474 N.W.2d 249 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Mayse
389 S.E.2d 585 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Northwestern Bank v. Roseman
354 S.E.2d 238 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)