Northwestern Bank v. Roseman
354 S.E.2d 238, 319 N.C. 394, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 1944
Opinion
Justices Martin and Webb took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court being divided three to two as to all issues presented and thus there being no majority of the Court voting to either affirm or reverse, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Northwestern Bank v. Roseman, 354 S.E.2d 238, 319 N.C. 394, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 1944 (N.C. 1987).
354 S.E.2d 238 (Northwestern Bank v. Roseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mole' v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2023
Hester v. Hubert Vester Ford, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015
One Beacon Insurance v. United Mechanical Corp.
700 S.E.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Centura Bank v. Executive Leather, Inc.
513 S.E.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Clark v. BH Holland Co., Inc.
852 F. Supp. 1268 (E.D. North Carolina, 1994)
State v. Connard
354 S.E.2d 238 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)