State v. Collins

209 S.W.3d 34, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1858, 2006 WL 3593425
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Collins. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 2006·No. No. ED 87940·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles R. Collins (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County upon his conviction by a jury of involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in “injecting” the “initial aggressor” language into Instruction Number 11. Defendant argues that the State did not present substantial evidence that Defendant was the initial aggressor. Because we hold that the trial court did not err, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Collins, 209 S.W.3d 34, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1858, 2006 WL 3593425 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

209 S.W.3d 34 (State v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.