State v. Collins

128 S.W.3d 579, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2004 WL 292148
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Collins. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2004·No. No. ED 83065·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ramon Collins (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of committing violence against an employee of the Department of Corrections. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for his conviction. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury might have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72-73 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to [580]*580Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Collins, 128 S.W.3d 579, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2004 WL 292148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

128 S.W.3d 579 (State v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Shinn
921 S.W.2d 70 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996)