State v. Collier
This text of 738 A.2d 369 (State v. Collier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Paul COLLIER, a/k/a Puff, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*370 Charles Ouslander, Assistant Prosecutor, for plaintiff-appellant (Daniel G. Giaquinto, Mercer County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Ouslander and Kimberly M. Lacken, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the briefs).
Mark H. Friedman, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, for defendant-respondent (Ivelisse Torres, Public Defender, attorney).
Bennett A. Barlyn, Deputy Attorney General, for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General, attorney).
Eric Tunis, West Orange, for amicus curiae Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Steinberg's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 316 N.J.Super. 181, 719 A.2d 1276 (1998).
For affirmanceChief Justice PORITZ and Justices O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, COLEMAN, VERNIERO, and LONG7.
OpposedNone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
738 A.2d 369, 162 N.J. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-collier-nj-1999.