State v. Coleman

904 S.W.2d 356, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1103, 1995 WL 351662
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 829
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 1995·No. Nos. 64006, 66779·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Coleman appeals his conviction for first degree robbery, in violation of § 569.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1994. Coleman also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Coleman, 904 S.W.2d 356, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1103, 1995 WL 351662 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

904 S.W.2d 356 (State v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.