State v. Coleman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Coleman

890 S.W.2d 378, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1984, 1994 WL 714549

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 829 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 1994·No. No. 64057·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, and the denial of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 motion. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for the court’s decision. Judgment of conviction and denial of Rule 29.15 motion affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, and the denial of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 motion. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for the court’s decision. Judgment of conviction and denial of Rule 29.15 motion affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Coleman, 890 S.W.2d 378, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1984, 1994 WL 714549 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

890 S.W.2d 378 (State v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.