State v. Coleman
524 So. 2d 514, 1988 La. LEXIS 1136, 1988 WL 46654
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 La. LEXIS 2802 →
Opinion
In re Coleman, Anthony; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the [515]*515Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-0714; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 282-037.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Coleman, 524 So. 2d 514, 1988 La. LEXIS 1136, 1988 WL 46654 (La. 1988).
524 So. 2d 514 (State v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.