State v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Coleman

524 So. 2d 514, 1988 La. LEXIS 1136, 1988 WL 46654

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 13, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KH-1109

StatusPublished

This text of 524 So. 2d 514 (State v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Coleman, 524 So. 2d 514, 1988 La. LEXIS 1136, 1988 WL 46654 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Coleman, Anthony; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the [515]*515Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-0714; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 282-037.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Coleman, Anthony; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the [515]*515Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-0714; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 282-037.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

524 So. 2d 514, 1988 La. LEXIS 1136, 1988 WL 46654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coleman-la-1988.