State v. Cole

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cole

313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 808, 2010 WL 2378924

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 2010

DocketED 93244

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 313 S.W.3d 236 (State v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cole, 313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 808, 2010 WL 2378924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Cole (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of first-degree robbery but acquitted him of armed criminal action. Defendant contends that the trial court erred by accepting inconsistent verdicts.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI