State v. Cole

313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 808, 2010 WL 2378924
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 2010·No. ED 93244·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Cole (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of first-degree robbery but acquitted him of armed criminal action. Defendant contends that the trial court erred by accepting inconsistent verdicts.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cole, 313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 808, 2010 WL 2378924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

313 S.W.3d 236 (State v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pruitt v. State
313 S.W.3d 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)